<font size="2" face="Verdana, Helvetica, sans-serif">I'm not trying to be argumentative, just bored. I wanted to point out that you make an excellent point about ratings BUT they didn't just compare the ratings to the other shows in the time period, they compared them to the ratings of the previous AG movie. One would assume (although this might not be true) that the ratings of the two movies they compare were among the same demographic. It would be pretty sneaky to say that the Felicity ratings were, say 6% (of age 18-49) but Samantha movie ratings were 72% (of age 5-9), and I assume (once again) that since the point of this article wasn't to mislead, the rating comparision of Felicity and Samantha were the same demographic (even if 18-49 is a silly one to look at for these movies) and that Felicity was lower.Originally posted by balletmom:
[QB]
The ratings quoted were based on total viewers ages 18-49, which would include adult males and females - not AG's target group. The ratings/share that AG would be interested in are girls ages 18 and under. So, in another words, if every girl the age of 13 or so and younger was watching the Felicity movie it demonstrates target saturation - great not only for AG but also any other companies targeting this particular demographic.
Of course, the example I gave is exactly why you shouldn't blindly follow statistics.
Bookmarks